If you’re in the construction industry, you’re probably familiar with the concept of a master schedule or contractual programme.
These complex beasts that were put together years before a shovel hits the soil by a team who have now probably moved on from the job, aren’t built for teams delivering work on-site, driving progress day by day.
Short-term construction schedules (often called lookahead plans) are developed to break down high-level contractual programmes into detailed, executable plans that can be both understood by site teams and used to report progress back up to the high-level plan.
Being such a critical part of the delivery of a project, short-term schedules are typically owned by the teams accountable for managing the delivery of works on-site i.e. Engineers.
Pssss, if you’re new to master schedules, then we’ve written an article all about them here.
There’s a plethora of academic research on construction scheduling and even more to be found on the various processes and management approaches of these schedules.
There are also different levels of complexity and sophistication that are appropriate to different types and sizes of projects. The short-term plan for the renovation of your kitchen will look very different to that of London’s Victoria Station improvements project.
All good short-term construction schedules should consist of these key elements:
One of the first things to consider when building a short-term construction schedule is deciding what tool to use. Although there are various tools, there are three that most teams tend to consider.
The original all-in-one project management tool. Many of you (particularly those who’ve spent more than a decade in the construction industry) will recognise Microsoft Project as the original go-to tool for building a construction schedule. A project management tool that offers a range of features and functionality to support more complex planning (e.g. financial planning), and is often used to manage both the master schedule and short-term schedule on smaller projects.
Pros:
Cons:
The second tool on the list is also one built by Microsoft, however, Excel is very different from Project in a number of ways.
Pretty much everyone has some level of knowledge of how spreadsheets work! As we know, these can be used in their simplest form as a way to organise data, but there is also a range of functions that can be used to customise and add layers of complexity to your tables.
Pros:
Cons:
Surprisingly, the only tool on the list built for the construction industry. Aphex is an easy-to-use scheduling tool that’s been built to help construction delivery teams quickly build their short-term plans.
Aphex can be deployed as easily on large, mega-projects in infrastructure like HS2, as on more simple projects with smaller teams.
Features such as trackable timelines and Gantt charts, along with a digital sequence deck and map view of your plans, remove all of the pain from building your short-term schedule.
Pros:
Cons:
There is a long list of reasons not to use spreadsheets to build construction plans. That being said, there are simple short-term plans that some teams think may be appropriate for spreadsheets.
On some - often smaller and simpler - projects, Microsoft Project can be an all-in-one scheduling option for both the contractual programme and short-term plan.
But projects that can benefit from promoting a collaborative planning process across the various teams delivering work, and the fit-for-purpose solutions to industry problems (e.g. mitigating interface clashes, understanding delay root-cause) tend to find Aphex to be better suited to their needs.